12 lines
1.6 KiB
JSON
12 lines
1.6 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"HubID": "5731",
|
|
"Date": "02/07/2026",
|
|
"HubTags": ["Future Map", "External Platform Posts"],
|
|
"Contacts": ["contact1", "contact2"],
|
|
"Companies": "",
|
|
"File": "",
|
|
"Image": "",
|
|
"Summary": "Continuing this original post, the rise of the corporate soverign, who wins, who loses and the effects. Anything state-adjacent - that is, it earns money from government contracts or people, who get entitlement spending, are in trouble. When you layer soverign debt, government has no choice but to cut payments everywhere - not just non-discretionary like entitlements, but discretionary as well. Layer on regulation, NIMBY and largely older generations and what I call the industrial complexes that will fight tooth and nail to prevent spending going to them, and futuer growth and change will not come from government. The corporate soveriegn - and we have already had them throughout history (Dutch East Indies Company, Hudson Bay Company), will rise to fill the gap. For example, as medicare and social security payments drop, corporate soverigns will step in offering AI healthcare. As public land support continues to fall, in steps corporate soverigns who will buy/rent these public spaces for resource extraction plus also managing for public use. So I would say private sector tied to our emerging AI driven economy (energy+chips+AI+robitcs) will fourish, while state-adjacent will stagnate. Wealth inequality is tied to this dynamic - the top are in emergent while many of the lower wealth classes are in the former. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/eddiesoehnel_trump-moves-to-have-tech-giants-pay-for-surging-activity-7424874399088119808-d-ks ",
|
|
"Notes": ""
|
|
}
|